A warm welcome to all friends visiting the site with a loving invitation to read my personal expressions on movies, music, poetry and life.

Music and Movies are like Ears and Eyes to me and if you also feel the same, then you are going to enjoy every moment spent on my works here, for sure.

Do send in your valuable comments and suggestions as they would be my guide for all the future works.


NOOR - What a confused and lazy way to make a crime investigative thriller with neither thrills nor any investigations ending on a weird note. (Review By Bobby Sing).

This Friday's One Line Reviews by Bobby Sing for making your movie plans..

When my Career Consultancy didn't work for a few strangely concerned parents. - by Bobby Sing (Few Life Inspiring Words - 23).

FAST & FURIOUS 8 (English/Hindi) - Partially enjoyable, but strictly for the fans loving the action genre. [TTP (To The Point) Review By Bobby Sing].

MANJE BISTRE (Punjabi) - It seems Punjabi Cinema is now stuck with period dramas focusing on a 'Vyah Wala Ghar' as their latest repetitive obsession. (Review By Bobby Sing).

BEGUM JAAN (Hindi) / RAJKAHINI (Bengali) - Benegal's MANDI meets Manto's TOBA TEK SINGH and Mehta's MIRCH MASALA in this bold but over dramatic effort, sadly remaining too bland to be called an epic despite its noble intentions. (An overview by Bobby Sing).

The last 2 shows at REGAL and the one man behind the event, nobody knows about. (A detailed emotional and technical description by Bobby Sing).

MUKTI BHAWAN (Hotel Salvation) - Could have been a classic, but surely deserves to be seen for its subject, performances and Varanasi in particular. (Review by Bobby Sing).

LAALI KI SHAADI MEIN LAADDOO DEEWANA - Stay away from this marriage and its tiring absurdity. [TTP (To The Point) Review By Bobby Sing].

MIRZA JUULIET - One of those strictly avoidable films that make you wonder why they got made and for whom? (Review By Bobby Sing).

  Directors I Love  
  Alfred Hitchcock  
  Mehboob Khan  
  Woody Allen  
  Akira Kurosawa  
  Basu Chatterjee  
  Bimal Roy  
  Charlie Chaplin  
  Chetan Anand  
  Govind Nihalani  
  Guru Dutt  
  Hrishikesh Mukherjee  
  Kamal Hassan  
  Ketan Mehta  
  Mrinal Sen  
  Quentin Tarantino  
  Raj Kapoor  
  Richard Attenborough  
  Sai Pranjpe  
  Satyajit Ray  
  Shyam Benegal  
  Steven Spielberg  
  Vijay Anand  
  Ram Gopal Verma  
  Ashutosh Gowariker  
  Mani Ratnam  
  Aleksandr Petrov  
  Saeed Akhtar Mirza  
  Shekhar Kapoor  
  Yash Chopra  
  Frank Capra  
  V. Shantaram  
  Billy Wilder  
  Rajkumar Hirani  
  Vishal Bhardwaj  
  Tigmanshu Dhulia  
  Dibaker Banerjee  
  Rajkumar Santoshi  
  Majid Majidi  
  Ritwik Ghatak  
  Clint Eastwood  
  Prakash Mehra  
  Manmohan Desai  
  Shoaib Mansoor  
  Anurag Kashyap  
  S. S. Rajamouli  
  B. R. Chopra  
  Stanley Kubrick  
  Also Active at  
  Gurmat Darshan.com  
  At Youtube.com  
  At Wordpress.com  
  At Facebook  
  At Twitter  
 April 2017 (13)
 March 2017 (11)
 February 2017 (9)
 January 2017 (12)
 December 2016 (12)
 November 2016 (11)
 October 2016 (15)
 September 2016 (10)
 August 2016 (12)
 July 2016 (12)
 June 2016 (16)
 May 2016 (14)
 April 2016 (17)
 March 2016 (10)
 February 2016 (10)
 January 2016 (9)
 December 2015 (11)
 November 2015 (10)
 October 2015 (10)
 September 2015 (11)
 August 2015 (12)
 July 2015 (15)
 June 2015 (10)
 May 2015 (15)
 April 2015 (16)
 March 2015 (12)
 February 2015 (10)
 January 2015 (14)
 December 2014 (11)
 November 2014 (10)
 October 2014 (10)
 September 2014 (12)
 August 2014 (12)
 July 2014 (21)
 June 2014 (23)
 May 2014 (24)
 April 2014 (23)
 March 2014 (21)
 February 2014 (26)
 January 2014 (28)
 December 2013 (10)
 November 2013 (14)
 October 2013 (16)
 September 2013 (14)
 August 2013 (14)
 July 2013 (12)
 June 2013 (11)
 May 2013 (23)
 April 2013 (10)
 March 2013 (14)
 February 2013 (14)
 January 2013 (15)
 December 2012 (18)
 November 2012 (14)
 October 2012 (15)
 September 2012 (14)
 August 2012 (15)
 July 2012 (12)
 June 2012 (14)
 May 2012 (16)
 April 2012 (15)
 March 2012 (10)
 February 2012 (11)
 January 2012 (11)
 December 2011 (10)
 November 2011 (11)
 October 2011 (15)
 September 2011 (10)
 August 2011 (11)
 July 2011 (11)
 June 2011 (13)
 May 2011 (16)
 April 2011 (14)
 March 2011 (11)
 February 2011 (10)
 January 2011 (12)
 December 2010 (10)
 November 2010 (12)
 October 2010 (11)
 September 2010 (11)
 August 2010 (12)
 July 2010 (12)
 June 2010 (11)
 May 2010 (14)
 April 2010 (15)
 March 2010 (14)
 February 2010 (12)
 January 2010 (15)
 December 2009 (12)
 November 2009 (14)
 October 2009 (15)
 September 2009 (18)
 August 2009 (14)
 July 2009 (16)
 June 2009 (18)
 May 2009 (16)
 April 2009 (18)
 March 2009 (20)
 February 2009 (19)
 January 2009 (20)
 December 2008 (20)
 November 2008 (17)
 October 2008 (21)
 September 2008 (19)
 August 2008 (22)
 July 2008 (23)
 June 2008 (21)
 May 2008 (25)
 April 2008 (22)
 March 2008 (25)
 February 2008 (22)
 January 2008 (22)
 December 2007 (24)
 November 2007 (22)
 October 2007 (22)
April 26, 2017 Wednesday     


The eighth addition in the series titled THE FATE OF THE FURIOUS aka FAST & FURIOUS 8 features Charlize Theron as an evil cyber terrorist taking everyone else for a ride, without even driving ever in the film operating from her digital den. The story yet again talks about a certain gadget/machine that can put off the electricity of an entire city and more nuclear codes too, re-activating a frozen submarine in its explosive climax.
Directed by Gary Gray, though the film misses the strong emotions felt in its last offering, it still scores for its action sequences in particular which is exactly what you expect in the series of Fast & Furious. Together Vin Diesel, Dwayne Johnson, Jason Statham, Michelle Rodriguez, Ludacris and Tyrese Gibson as a team try hard to deliver a lot more than its mediocre scripting. But eventually it’s only the action and the novel execution (towards the end) which makes it partially enjoyable (defying the logic) showcasing vehicles falling from the buildings, cars being followed by a submarine and the fiery car race in the beginning.
In fact (having watched it in Hindi too), the film turns into an enjoyable comedy at times due to some hilariously translated lines such as “Caaron Ki Baarish Kara Do”, “Tere Ganje Sir Par Dandiya Khelunga” and more. In short, where some die-hard fans might not mind watching it as the eighth film in the series, many are sure going to be disappointed expecting much more in the package other than the ‘must have’ action.
Rating : 2.5 / 5
Tags : Fast & Furious 8 Review by Bobby Sing, The Fate of The Furious Review by Bobby Sing, English Movies Reviews by Bobby Sing, English Films released in India Review by bobby sing, Enlgish Films Reviews at bobbytalkscinema.com, Vin Diesel and The Rock, Action at its best
16 April 2017 / bobbysing /
leave a comment

Manje Bistre (Punjabi)

Post the thought provoking, experimental debut as a writer-director in ARDAAS (2016), I was really interested to see what would be the second venture of the team Gippy Grewal, Baljit Singh Deo, Gurpreet Ghuggi and Rana Ranbir together, since ARDAAS showed the glimpses of a rare courage in Punjabi Cinema to present something different and meaningful taking a big risk.
Unfortunately, shattering all expectations of watching something novel and better from the talented team, MANJE BISTRE sadly displays the typical routine mindset of ‘blindly going with the trend’, taking the minimum risk possible in commercial terms.
So forgetting all the courage and spirit shown in their first project, the team chooses the safest, tried and tested path of a light comic film woven around traditional wedding celebrations taking you back in time (in the 90s), following the latest trend in Punjabi Cinema post the success of ANGREJ, BAMBUKAAT and also NIKKA ZAILDAAR.
In other words, avoiding the risk of rejection and playing it pretty safe, Gipyy Grewal (as writer-actor-producer), Baljit Singh Deo (as cinematographer-director) and Rana Ranbir (penning the dialogues) together deliver a product which is nothing but a bunch of light hearted comic sequences, double meaning dialogues, a few over-the-top funny characters, a couple of catchy songs and the usual romantic drama without any basic storyline or plot giving you the exact picture. In fact it’s exactly how Karan Johar productions keep on making shallow romantic products with two young STAR FACES in the lead and one or two good songs having the minimum chances of failure in the first 5 days of its release (who cares about the rest?).
Beginning with a forced and annoying comic background score in its very first scenes, the film goes on and on for 30 minutes, then interval and even 100 minutes before a wafer thin twist is there which cannot even be called as a story-plot. Further concluding on a predictable happy note missing any solid punch, the only merit of the film is that it doesn’t bore you and keeps moving at a constant pace revolving around a group of characters staying in the same spacious home for a wedding, with Sonam Bajwa shining bright in her traditional attires having the most pleasant screen presence of them all.
Apart from a fine lead act by Gippy and strictly typecast acts of Rana Ranbir, Sardar Sohi, Anita Devgan, Hobby Dhaliwal and more, MANJE BISTRE wastes the veterans Gurpreet Ghuggi and B.N. Sharma in their short cameos, whereas Karmajit Anmol thankfully delivers as an old mischievous halwai teasing everyone around.
For friends looking at it as a Punjabi version of Rajshri films like HUM AAPKE HAIN KAUN, the film is not even close to that, as HAHK had a rock solid emotional plot revealed in its second half. Whereas in MANJE BISTRE you keep on waiting for the plot and it soon reaches the climax without even caring about the same in a weird manner.
Overall, I would not call MANJE BISTRE a bad film, as for many it might provide a simple time pass entertainment during their weekend outings. But I would personally like to call it a highly disappointing film……. as such strictly clichéd, routine and flat kind of project was certainly not expected from the team behind the impressive and respectable ARDAAS.
Putting it bluntly, if a successful and capable team also fearfully comes up with a MANJE BISTRE post a film like ARDAAS……….., then its certainly worrying for Punjabi language and its cinema in progressive terms.
Rating : 2 / 5
An important afterthought on portrayal of SIKH on screen in the present.
The scenario in Punjabi Cinema has completely changed in the last couple of years post the success achieved by Diljit Dosanjh in particular, taking ‘the turban’ to Bollywood camps gaining much respect and praise breaking the demoralizing norm. As a result, the turban is now being followed as a trend, lot more than a cultural or religious identity to be straight.
If truth be told, had this film been made some 3-4 years back then you would have seen Gippy in his original look of a clean shaven hero for sure enacting the same role (similar to his pop songs). But since ‘the turban’ is the new in-thing, so he is here with ‘a fake pagdi and beard’ just to encash the ongoing trend more than anything else.
Interestingly, the present scenario reveals another strange irony faced by Punjabi community and their cinema, when their own Punjabi icons from Punjab itself now have to wear fake turbans and beards to play Sikhs on screen, whereas earlier there used to be objections on Bollywood heroes and comedians exactly faking the same in their Hindi films.
No doubt perceptions change with the changes in time and trend for the obvious reasons.
Tags : Manje Bistre Punjabi Movie Review by Bobby Sing, Manje Bistre Film Review by Bobby Sing, New Punjabi Film Reviews by Bobby Sing, Punjabi Cinema Reviews at bobbytalkscinema.com
15 April 2017 / bobbysing /
leave a comment
Honestly I am not too keen to write a detailed review of these films as I have something much more important to share triggered by the films only, (both) written and directed by Srijit Mukherji, amalgamating some classic works of the past by the renowned maestros. At least for me its extremely important to share and convey particularly to my young passionate readers in their teens or early 20s or 30s.
But keeping that important share for the last, for friends willing to read the key points of a routine review, here is the description as well as a comparison that will clearly give you the picture as desired. 
Firstly Srijit truly deserves appreciation for writing a story putting together the classic works of the maestros in an intriguing form rarely attempted before in our Indian cinema. Though the execution becomes the victim of its own gigantic attempt raising the expectations, still I would like to praise the effort thinking beyond the usual norms of adapting only one story at a time or a film in the routine manner.
Giving you the reference of all the major works Srijit takes his praiseworthy inspiration from, he begins from a brothel taking you back in the year 47, strongly reminding you of the premise of Shyam Benegal’s MANDI and its superfine cast ensemble. After the initial 35-40 minutes, he incorporates the basic highly thought provoking idea taken from Saadat Hassan Manto’s famous short story titled TOBA TEK SINGH pointing towards the line of partition drawn by a hurriedly appointed officer by the Britishers. In a few sequences he takes his references from the works of Manto’s contemporary ISMAT CHUGTAI and then leads towards the final hour highly inspired/influenced by Ketan Mehta’s classic MIRCH MASALA.
Having summed up the story structure giving you a fair idea, following are the short reviews of both the films before I move on to the most important share in the concluding section.
Begum JaanBEGUM JAAN (Hindi) – As an individual film, it can easily be stated as a madly overstuffed venture with too many bold scenes added just to surprise or impress the viewers through a questionable shock-technique. However in the process the earlier worth contemplating scenes get brutally affected by the newer ones and the viewer just keeps on watching without getting time to give a serious thought on any one particular scene.
Yes, the key bold sequences and dialogues at times leave you stunned unexpected from the faces on screen. But they together do not generate any collective effect you can take back home, becoming the biggest shortcoming of the film unable to convey its well-intentioned important social message. The second half makes a much better impression moving ahead of the first but the prolonged directionless climax fails to lift up the spirits which ideally should have been the main highlight of the film as per the chosen format.
Everything seems to be too over-dramatic, quite desperate to make an impact including the key acts. In short a hidden wish and a forced attempt to ‘construct a classic’ is simply visible in its almost every sequence, which adversely affects the otherwise sincere and bold performances of Vidya Balan, followed by Pitobash, Gauhar Khan and Pallavi Sharda (though their awfully bad Punjabi accent plays a big spoilsport). Seasoned actors such as Naseeruddin Shah, Rajit Kapur and Ashish Vidyarthi remain plain ordinary in their respective scenes, whereas Ila Arun, Rajesh Sharma, Vivek Mushran, Sumit Nijhawan and other supporting girls fail to stand out in absence of any significant scene. In fact, Ila Arun’s narration of the various historical stories does not gel at all and looks completely out of place inserted abruptly.
Unexpectedly the most natural act in the film comes from Chunky Pandey playing the evil man and other notable merit is its music which actually works more as an individual soundtrack in comparison to what you get to hear and see on the screen. Cinematography and Art direction keeps trying to give it an authentic period feel (with some unusual angles) and background score turns out to be too loud in most of the sequences lacking the required feel.
In all, ending with an appreciable rendition of Sahir’s “Woh Subah Kabhi To Aayegi” BEGUM JAAN simply gives you the feeling of a well-amalgamated plot sadly getting lost in the shouts, shrieks and forced aggressive dialogues rendered by the ladies together. Projected as a venture with some kind of lifetime performance given by Vidya Balan, the film actually doesn’t allow her to leave any major impact at all due to its own shortcomings.
Rating : 2 / 5
(Bengali)As the original film from the same writer-director, I did find RAJKAHINI a lot better in execution but not any classic film to be honest respecting the noble intentions. The film loses the sarcasm behind its basic plot of ‘line of partition’ in the other over-crowded sub-plots and characters and doesn’t turn out to be as effective as the classics it takes its references from. Having a longer duration RAJKAHINI gives more breathing space to its characters and sequences without any visible rush and thus is able to make a decent impact on the viewers despite many major flaws.
Incorporating a brutally shocking story of Saadat Hassan Manto in the very beginning, its strongest merit remains the portrayal of Begum Jaan by Rituparna, who manages to create a different aura through her rough, don-like act, though I wish she had not used the gimmick of a hoarse voice (reminding you of another failed attempt to do the same by Amitabh Bachchan in his AGNEEPATH).
The music works perfectly in the film and so does the background score used effectively in the key explosive sequences. Plus the evil contract-killer addition works well in its second half delivering the missing required thrills in the initial hour. However, neither the character of ‘master’ nor the inclusion of Radcliffe works in its favour, particularly when the director strangely brings in a Bengali actor to play a British officer coming to India for the first time.
At times the film appears more like a stage presentation with only a few people used to portray the refugee camps, migration, riots, killings and more, which truly does not justify the representation of a country’s partition. Moreover with some compromising graphics and a visionless depiction (read aimless firing) in its climax, RAJKAHINI fails to create the much desired tension filled crescendo, leaving you with a feeling of having seen something well-tried without reaching the level of an epic or classic.
Rating : 3 / 5
COMPARISON -        
Apart from using the similar set and location, interestingly the writer-director uses the same footage of his Bengali film in the few sequences of his Hindi remake too (if I am not wrong) as there are no close-ups or recognizable artists visible in them showcasing the refugee camps, migrating people and more in mostly long shots.
BEGUM JAAN begins with a brutally shocking night sequence (of the present) shot at Delhi’s Connaught Place wherein a young couple gets saved by an old lady. And then the director appreciably connects the old lady to one of the impressive climax sequences happening back in 47-48 leaving you in a stunning thinking mode. On the other hand RAJKAHINI begins differently with a fine adaptation of one of the most unkind and harshest short story of Saadat Hassan Manto titled KHOL DO. And then the writer takes forward the story linking it to Begum Jaan’s brothel in the very next scene in a thoughtfully related manner.
As a Hindi film, where BEGUM JAAN ends with Sahir's well written “Woh Subah Kabhi To Aayegi” pointing towards the never dying hope, the Bengali original ends with a version of “Jan Gan Man” on a similar introspective note catering its regional audience.
In the performances, Rituparna scores more as Begum Jaan with the only drawback being her deliberate voice texture tried, actually taking the act far away from anything natural or realistic. However Vidya Balan’s sincere act keeps struggling to get out of the loud, forced dialogues with intentionally added abuses presenting it in a highly over-dramatic tone throughout. To give you an idea, when you are openly running a brothel and playing its outspoken owner then why to keep reminding the visitors about the same as if they don’t know where they are standing and for what purpose?
Where the supporting acts of the girls decently works in the original in absence of any Punjabi dialogues, both Gauhar and Pallavi keep annoying with their awful Punjabi accent, never taken care of by the director, because he himself might not be knowing the right pronunciation of many specific words. Here I would humbly like to raise a question that when all the actors and their directors duly want the Urdu diction in the dialogues to be just perfect without any major mistakes then why don’t they follow the same process and learning while using the Punjabi dialogues? Or is it the case that they think Punjabi is a too casual language that can be used anywhere in any manner without looking into the specific details of accent and the right pronunciation?
Correcting his mistake of casting a Bengali actor in the role of the British officer Radcliffe in RAJKAHINI, Srijit uses a voice over of Amitabh Bachchan explaining the situation in his Hindi remake and cuts off all the political sequences and dialogues largely diluting the impact of its beginning jumping straight to the point.
Experimenting with the framing, Srijit shows half faces of his characters in tight close-ups confronting with each other. Without creating any enhancing impact, one doesn’t mind watching it in RAJKAHINI, but in BEGUM JAAN it looks pretty awkward as some kind of error annoying the viewers instead of making a statement of any kind.
As a common conclusion, never in any of the version the director explains that why Begum Jaan is ready to sacrifice everyone’s life and fight but not willing to move out of the venue asking for another home in exchange from the visiting officials, when she could have easily re-establish the ‘always selling sex-business’ anywhere in the town taking advantage of her reputation earned. The reasoning is never there in any of the main dialogues of the leading lady and that’s exactly what defines the decisive difference between the vision of a blessed, progressive writer like MANTO and his inspired clones.
In all, respectfully dedicated to Manto and Ismat Chugtai, though RAJKAHINI scores a lot more than its Hindi remake BEGUM JAAN due to the above mentioned merits, I would still not hesitate to rate both as more or less missed opportunities as per their well-chosen, thoughtful theme mixing the masters works.
Coming to most important part of this write-up,
At times cinema greatly helps when it manages to catch the right spirit and soul of a novel or short story introducing you to a writer for the first time and you get truly inspired to dig more information about the master and his much appreciated famous works post watching the impressive film.
But what happens when a director and his project fails to do the same?
What happens when a filmmaker is not able to interpret or represent the soul of the original story/novel coming out with a mediocre or poor film?
What happens if a movie tells you the same story in a completely different manner remaining far away from its brutal essence and the original ‘exclusive’ charm?
In all the above cases,
such a film literally ‘robs you’ …………….. robs you of an experience which can never be relived or repaired again in the entire lifetime ahead resulting in a big loss.
Explaining it differently, if you haven’t read or seen the original works of Manto, Shyam Benegal and Ketan Mehta (writer-director has been inspired from) and have already seen either RAJKAHINI or BEGUM JAAN faintly revealing their powerful basic content incorporating it all together……… then you have been robbed of a precious shocking experience knowing their cruel twists……. that would have certainly made a much greater, transforming impact if innocently read and seen in their original forms.
In more specific words,
What Manto’s KHOL DO does to you in its raw form… RAJKAHINI doesn’t.
The way Manto’s TOBA TEK SINGH forces you to stop for a while and think…… BEGUM JAAN doesn’t.
And how both Shyam Benegal’s MANDI and Ketan Mehta’s MIRCH MASALA impressively come out with their respective social messages ……. BEGUM JAAN or RAJ KAHINI fail to do the same robbing you of that essential VIRGIN SHOCK………. forever.
In fact this is the serious damage such films do to the great, unmissable life teaching literature and meaningful cinema…. unintentionally.
Summing up, on the cost of sounding preachy or interfering in your personal choices, if you have already seen any of the two films without going through the original works then the damage has already been done, but if you haven’t watched any of them yet, then do first try to read and see the following experiencing the magic in the right sequence as it should be…….. giving you the shocking experience.
Read Manto’s short stories TOBA TEK SINGH & KHOL DO (in context of the film) and as many more as you can at the following link.
Watch both Shyam Benegal’s MANDI (based on a short story ‘ANANDI’ by Ghulam Abbas) and Ketan Mehta’s MIRCH MASALA (based on a short story ‘ABU MAKRANI’ by Chunnilal Madiya) easily available in DVDs and the official online.
And then go for either RAJKAHINI (Bengali) or BEGUM JAAN (Hindi) as per your choice realizing the major difference in their visions and presentations.
Sharing an interesting fact in the end, MANDI was the first film in which Ila Arun got introduced in 1983 (revolving around a brothel), also contributing her bit in the lyrics department. And now after almost 35 years she plays the most elderly lady in a similar brothel taking care about the girls and a kid too completing a full circle.
Tags : Begum Jaan Review, Rajkahini Review by Bobby Sing, Begum Jaan Film Review by Bobby Sing, Remake of Rajkahini, Inspired from Manto's Toba Tek Singh, Manto's Khol Do, Shyam Benegal's MANDI, Ketan Mehta's MIRCH MASALA, Inspired Films, ew Hindi Movies Reviews, New Hindi Movies Released, New Bollywood Reviews, Bobby Talks Cinema Review, Reviews By Bobby Sing, New Hindi Films Reviews at bobbytalkscinema.com, Bengali Movies Reviews by Bobby Sing
14 April 2017 / bobbysing /
leave a comment
Reviews in All (929)

Inspired Hindi Movies
List (517)
Articles on Music,
Poetry & Life (97)
Did You Know! (88)
Few Life Inspiring Words! (23)
Nostalgia (Books on Cinema,Vintage Magazines, Scans & more) (28)
Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
Google Analytics Alternative
The site is a collection of personal expressions of the writer to share his own views on different mediums of art, with no intention of hurting any person or organisation in particular. The site is also not responsible for any inappropriate acts practiced by the third party links added here only for information purposes.
   Visit bobbytalkscinema.com for Bollywood Movie Reviews, Inspired Cinema, Movies To See Before You Die, Amazing Bollywood Facts, Articles On Cinema, Music, Poetry & Life
Site Best View At 1024 X 768 Resolution & Above