A warm welcome to all friends visiting the site with a loving invitation to read my personal expressions on movies, music, poetry and life.

Music and Movies are like Ears and Eyes to me and if you also feel the same, then you are going to enjoy every moment spent on my works here, for sure.

Do send in your valuable comments and suggestions as they would be my guide for all the future works.

ENJOY!

ANAARKALI OF AARAH - You praised Amitabh teaching the meaning of a woman's NO in the court, now praise Swara doing the same in a differently authentic manner. (Review By Bobby Sing).

PHILLAURI - It's a confusingly conceived Punjabi film made in Hindi, based on an interesting but inspired idea with the only merit being its emotional climax. (Review By Bobby Sing).

TRAPPED - Post an unconvincing start, it fairly keeps you engaged as a praise-worthy off-beat attempt featuring an impressive solo act and some notable merits. (Review By Bobby Sing).

This Friday's One Line Reviews by Bobby Sing for making your weekend movie plans..

KONG SKULL ISLAND (English) - Though lacks an emotional pull and the original charm, it's still an incredibly made entertaining comic-book adventure to be experienced in a well-equipped theater. (Review by Bobby Sing).

BADRINATH KI DULHANIA - A unique case of the makers returning with the same lead pair, a similar title, identical looks and the same old premise of a wedding, mocking at the viewers patience & choice. (Review by Bobby Sing).

LION (English/2016) - An emotionally uplifting film which once again depicts INDIA in a bad light and we know the westerners do have a fascination for such dark representation of our country since decades. (Review by Bobby Sing).

ANUPAMA (1967) - Its touching emotional climax and DDLJ - By Bobby Sing.

COMMANDO 2 - Focusing on suspense instead of action, Vidyut gets no support in this poor and so casually conceived film unfortunately. (Review By Bobby Sing).

LOGAN (English/Hindi) - You will make faces, tighten your fists and do several things going through this brutal, cold blooded must watch thriller for sure. (Review by Bobby Sing).

 
 
  Directors I Love  
  Alfred Hitchcock  
  Mehboob Khan  
  Woody Allen  
  Akira Kurosawa  
  Basu Chatterjee  
  Bimal Roy  
  Charlie Chaplin  
  Chetan Anand  
  Govind Nihalani  
  Gulzar  
  Guru Dutt  
  Hrishikesh Mukherjee  
  Kamal Hassan  
  Ketan Mehta  
  Mrinal Sen  
  Quentin Tarantino  
  Raj Kapoor  
  Richard Attenborough  
  Sai Pranjpe  
  Satyajit Ray  
  Shyam Benegal  
  Steven Spielberg  
  Vijay Anand  
  Ram Gopal Verma  
  Ashutosh Gowariker  
  Mani Ratnam  
  Aleksandr Petrov  
  Saeed Akhtar Mirza  
  Shekhar Kapoor  
  Yash Chopra  
  Frank Capra  
  V. Shantaram  
  Billy Wilder  
  Rajkumar Hirani  
  Vishal Bhardwaj  
  Tigmanshu Dhulia  
  Dibaker Banerjee  
  Rajkumar Santoshi  
  Majid Majidi  
  Ritwik Ghatak  
  Clint Eastwood  
  Prakash Mehra  
  Manmohan Desai  
  Shoaib Mansoor  
  Anurag Kashyap  
  S. S. Rajamouli  
  B. R. Chopra  
  Stanley Kubrick  
 
  Also Active at  
  Gurmat Darshan.com  
  At Youtube.com  
  At Wordpress.com  
  At Facebook  
  At Twitter  
 
 
 
FROM THE GOOD
OLD DAYS
 March 2017 (10)
 February 2017 (6)
 January 2017 (14)
 December 2016 (12)
 November 2016 (11)
 October 2016 (15)
 September 2016 (10)
 August 2016 (12)
 July 2016 (12)
 June 2016 (16)
 May 2016 (14)
 April 2016 (17)
 March 2016 (10)
 February 2016 (10)
 January 2016 (9)
 December 2015 (11)
 November 2015 (10)
 October 2015 (10)
 September 2015 (11)
 August 2015 (12)
 July 2015 (15)
 June 2015 (10)
 May 2015 (15)
 April 2015 (16)
 March 2015 (12)
 February 2015 (10)
 January 2015 (14)
 December 2014 (11)
 November 2014 (10)
 October 2014 (10)
 September 2014 (12)
 August 2014 (12)
 July 2014 (21)
 June 2014 (23)
 May 2014 (24)
 April 2014 (23)
 March 2014 (21)
 February 2014 (26)
 January 2014 (28)
 December 2013 (10)
 November 2013 (14)
 October 2013 (16)
 September 2013 (14)
 August 2013 (14)
 July 2013 (12)
 June 2013 (11)
 May 2013 (23)
 April 2013 (10)
 March 2013 (14)
 February 2013 (14)
 January 2013 (15)
 December 2012 (18)
 November 2012 (14)
 October 2012 (15)
 September 2012 (14)
 August 2012 (15)
 July 2012 (12)
 June 2012 (14)
 May 2012 (16)
 April 2012 (15)
 March 2012 (10)
 February 2012 (11)
 January 2012 (11)
 December 2011 (10)
 November 2011 (11)
 October 2011 (15)
 September 2011 (10)
 August 2011 (11)
 July 2011 (11)
 June 2011 (13)
 May 2011 (16)
 April 2011 (14)
 March 2011 (11)
 February 2011 (10)
 January 2011 (12)
 December 2010 (10)
 November 2010 (12)
 October 2010 (11)
 September 2010 (11)
 August 2010 (12)
 July 2010 (12)
 June 2010 (11)
 May 2010 (14)
 April 2010 (15)
 March 2010 (14)
 February 2010 (12)
 January 2010 (15)
 December 2009 (12)
 November 2009 (14)
 October 2009 (15)
 September 2009 (18)
 August 2009 (14)
 July 2009 (16)
 June 2009 (18)
 May 2009 (16)
 April 2009 (18)
 March 2009 (20)
 February 2009 (19)
 January 2009 (20)
 December 2008 (20)
 November 2008 (17)
 October 2008 (21)
 September 2008 (19)
 August 2008 (22)
 July 2008 (23)
 June 2008 (21)
 May 2008 (25)
 April 2008 (22)
 March 2008 (25)
 February 2008 (22)
 January 2008 (22)
 December 2007 (24)
 November 2007 (22)
 October 2007 (22)
 
 
 
 
 
March 30, 2017 Thursday     
There are two kinds of movies based on serial killers. One, where you are not shown the real identity of the killer and the film is all about the search completely depending upon the mystery element involved in the investigation process, and two, where you are straight away introduced to the psycho man and then get to see him making all his random or specific killings with the police trying to catch him as the third party.
Interestingly where the first kind of presentation makes an engaging and exciting watch due to its teasing suspense, the second largely remains a psychological film heavily depending upon its way of presentation, the performances and the director’s personal interpretation of the theme reaching out to his target audience.
The present RAMAN RAGHAV 2.0 is the second kind of film to be specific, so the viewers looking for some food to satisfy their hungry grey cell are going to be disappointed. More so because the film doesn’t have any kind of deep justifications or detailing given to its characters leaving you with many unanswered questions about the crimes committed so ruthlessly.
Having said that there still is a masterstroke played by director Anurag Kashyap through his clever title and the pre-release hype created around a man, the film is least concerned about in its entire duration of more than two hours.
Inspired from a brutal serial killer of mid 60s operating in Mumbai and a short docu-fiction kind of film made on the subject by director Sriram Raghavan (with Raghuvir Yadav) in the early 90s, Anurag named his film as RAMAN RAGHAV 2.0 and the whole world started thinking as if the film was all about that 60’s weirdo serial killer and Nawazuddin was playing the same in his own peculiar style visualized by Anurag Kashyap.
But as the film begins, a few slides inform you about the original Raman Raghav and the next one clearly says that, This is not about that Raman Raghav of 1960s, simply mocking all those web-articles, news-items, features and more written with a wrong assumption taking it a bio-pic on the lesser known criminal made by the controversial director. In fact the complete title using two names Raman and Raghav adding a 2.0, gives you an entirely different meaning in the end, which exactly is a masterstroke reminding you of the ones associated with the renowned film-makers such as Quentin Tarantino who certainly have a strong influence over Kashyap and many more new-age Indian directors of this present age.
Dividing the film into several chapters (on a similar format seen in many QT films), the second clever feature of RR 2.0 remains its well written dialogues that force you to think upon them repeatedly. And the rest is done by the fine performances with Nawazuddin Siddiqui once again delivering a gem of an act (as a psycho killer) followed by the talented Vicky Kaushal (as the drug addict inspector), Sobhita Dhulipala (as Vicky’s girlfriend), Amruta Subhash (as Nawazuddin’s sister) and Vipin Sharma (in a cameo appearance).
Opening with strobe effects in a pub playing the ‘Qatl-e-Aam’ track, the film straight away gives you the surprise of being a story of a fictional serial killer in the present era and not the one from the 60s. The progression remains engaging with a tight editing, but not for everyone sitting in the theatre due to some severely shocking and mentally violent scenes along with a particular appalling one (discussed in details later). Unnecessary abuses can be noticed in a few scenes besides the brutal killings and the parallel track of the inspector adds a different angle into the storyline making it an interesting watch. Yet it largely remains dependent upon the acting skills of Nawazuddin Siddiqui alone till interval and doesn’t have any exciting twists and turns normally associated with such intense crime thrillers focusing on a cunning character.
Post intermission, a monotonous kind of feel, deliberate song insertions and the romantic track of the investigating officer reduces the impact further. But it thankfully ends with some decent sequences conceived around its two key characters completing each other. However I personally didn’t find any kind of big or fresh, unpredictable revelations made in its final moments.
Majorly saved by his performers instead of any exceptional writing or screenplay, no doubt Anurag is back in a good form with his Raman Raghav, but this also cannot be rated as any winning innings from the director visiting his favourite genre of dark and violent crime thrillers. Yes, one doesn’t feel bored looking at the quick story developments talking about more than one psycho character on the screen. Yet it doesn’t turn out to be any powerful, mind blowing serial killer movie forcing you to think and keep guessing on a constant basis. Also, a strong ‘Déjà vu’ kind of feeling is always there watching the entire film. May be because we have already seen Nawazuddin doing several similar kind of roles in the past as in BADLAPUR, MISS LOVELY, TALAASH, GANGS OF WASSEYPUR and more. Admittedly playing such creepy characters Siddiqui looks so convincing, that probably the directors are not able to think of any other name for such roles (sadly) typecasting a terrific performer.  
As a Anurag Kashyap film, RR 2.0 is unable to deliver that expected depth and pull which was much better in his UGLY in comparative terms. Though Kashyap successfully makes you feel the blood and violence happening on the screen without even showing it visually through an intelligent camerawork and sound, yet one doesn’t feel any kind of empathy for either the victims or the lead characters throughout the film in any way whatsoever. In fact you don’t even feel any strong hatred too for either Nawaz or Vicky at all as they never turn out to be some compelling characters reaching out to the viewers in any impactful manner as desired. One just keeps watching them emoting on the screen and doesn’t feel like exploring their criminal mindsets, their personal reasoning behind the murders and more, unlike a film revolving around a mad, sinister serial killer. Moreover it was really strange to see such a childish depiction of Police in the film, where the officials simply forget about a person locked in a deserted building and then casually hold a dangerous wanted murderer as if he is a local pocketmaar being taken to the police station.
On the technical ground, as always Anurag delivers a polished product with a noteworthy camerawork shooting at actual locations and a captivating background score giving a rhythmic edge to the film enhancing the onscreen proceedings. However there can be no denying to the fact that such catchy riffs, beats or songs commencing at just the right moment do make you feel pumped up as if participating in the criminal activity shown on the screen that can easily be stated as glorifying or romancing the violence in a dangerously influential manner. Also at times provocative, violent lyrics served with appealing beats or arrangements do make me think about the impact they can make on the youngsters in a dark, smoke filled night club playing them too loud. For instance, imagine a song like ‘Behooda’ being played in a disco and people improvising on its lyrics making different postures.
Spoilers Ahead
Coming to the most disturbing sequence in the film, Anurag continues with the subject of incestuous relationships in his present RR 2.0 too as seen in his THAT GIRL WITH YELLOW BOOTS released in 2013. But here the insertion is quite deliberate that could have been easily avoided as the purpose of character assassination of both Nawaz and Amruta was already done in the explosive lines spoken just before the introduction of the appalling incest angle. To give you a clear idea, the moment Nawaz makes all those shocking revelations about Amruta’s young days right in front of her husband without any hiding at all, it completely crushes her entire persona in a much decisive manner in just a few seconds. But Anurag willfully doesn’t stop there and goes on adding the incest angle into the sequence too in order to make it more brutal and disturbing. In other words, when the mention of all young premature sexual relationships and incest was already made in the dialogues itself, it was clearly deliberate moving into more verbal and physical depiction of the same sensationalizing the entire scene.
For records, the topic of incest has been there in Hindi Cinema in more than 25 films since the 1940s (mentioned in details in the last chapter of my book DID YOU KNOW (Vol.1) available online), but it has never been presented with such a disgusting visual execution ever till date as in RR 2.0.
However, comparing this particular sequence with the 89 cuts given to last week’s UDTA PUNJAB, its really strange that the censor board find the abuses spoken in a scene as objectionable but not there visual depiction on the screen quite weirdly. So you cannot say it as an abuse but can practically show it in a scene justifying your character’s requirement. That’s really a great insightful thinking indeed with some amazing logic. (I hope you can easily get what I wish to express here without using the exact words).
Concluding the review with another worth mentioning scene in the film, this is where we get to see the mental level of Nawazuddin’s wacko character (that can also be stated as the best scene of the film as per my personal opinion), where he is not able to count even two thousand rupees with a few notes lying on the counter getting confused repeatedly. The scene actually conveys that though his physical age might have crossed 30-35, but his mental age is still somewhere stuck around under-10. And in reality this can also be noticed in many of the normal people in the society too…………. who are not any criminals!
In all RAMAN RAGHAV 2.0 can certainly be seen once for Nawazuddin Siddiqui and his thoughtful dialogues alone without expecting any great, path breaking serial killer film from the over-famous Anurag Kashyap.
Rating : 2.5 + 0.5 / 5 (with an additional 0.5 just for the clever trick played with the title)
Tags : Raman Raghav 2.0 Review by Bobby Sing, Raman Raghav 2.0 Film Review by Bobby Sing, RR 2.0 Review, New Bollywood Movies Released, New Hindi Films Reviews, New Hindi Movies Reviews, New Hindi Movies Released, New Bollywood Reviews, Bobby Talks Cinema Review, Reviews By Bobby Sing, New Hindi Films Reviews at bobbytalkscinema.com
 
 
24 June 2016 / bobbysing /
leave a comment
 
 
8 Responses to “RAMAN RAGHAV 2.0 - A fine crime thriller, depending more upon its performances and dialogues instead of any exciting mystery, presented along a severely appalling sequence of incest. (Review By Bobby Sing)”
Shyam   www.hollybollycollection.com/
submitted on 28 June 2016

I will watch this movie only for Nawazuddin Sidhiqui. Your Detailed Review about RR 2.0 clears all my points. But RR 2.0 didn't do well at the box office. Keep writing such great Review.

bobbysing
submitted on 29 June 2016

Thanks a lot Shyam for your kind support.
Keep visiting and writing in.
Cheers!

SD   
submitted on 01 July 2016
Dont remember when was the last time you gave extra rating just for the title of the movie!
bobbysing
submitted on 01 July 2016

Hindi films rarely make such a play with their titles.
The last film that had a title that could make you think was SHIP OF THESEUS and its right there in the MOVIES TO SEE BEFORE YOU DIE List too.

Cheers!

Vikas Saitya   
submitted on 06 July 2016
Dear Bobby

The movie & Anurag Kashyap can be describe as:

BLACK FRIDAY brilliance reduced to RAMAN RAGHAV bullshit

brilliance/bullshit 2.0

Best Regards

Vikas Saitya
bobbysing
submitted on 11 July 2016

Dear Vikas,
In India, out of several other issues coming up in this particular time period, we have one major issue developed in the last two decades post 2000, wherein we do not look at things as per their own content and value.
But tend to form an opinion according to the name or team who has made it having some pre-assumption of our own about the particular person in particular.
The same stands for books, music, paintings and other art forms too. 
For instance a song that is a complete waste, becomes a chart buster in a Salman Khan movie for the obvious reasons and a great song by a newcomer in a lesser known film gets lost.

Sharing some personal observation, many in the media as well as industry just keep waiting to slam AK's films for their own reasons and there is a certain lobby that works against him and his associated quite openly.

But rising above this all, for me the film was a fine thriller minus that one unnecessary scene as mentioned.

Moreover, I have recently seen the original 70 min. film made by Sriram Raghavan on Raman Raghav in 1991 for TV too and believe me it is as brutal as this in terms of execution, feel and everything else.

In fact considering the fact that Sriram made that film in 1991 before even Anurag started gives you a good idea of how this genre actually needs to be treated to justify the shocking story.

Cheers!

 

vky   
submitted on 27 September 2016

Moreover, I have recently seen the original 70 min. film made by Sriram Raghavan on Raman Raghav in 1991 for TV too and believe me it is as brutal as this in terms of execution, feel and everything else.
 

bobbysing
submitted on 28 September 2016

Dear Vky,
I have also seen the original 70 min. film made by Sriram Raghavan for TV and you will soon get to read on the same with another third person's view on the figure too as an exclusive BTC article.

So keep visiting in.
Cheers!

Leave A Reply
Name
E-mail (will not be published)
Website
verification image, type it in the box Enter Verification Code
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
Reviews in All (929)

 
 
 
Inspired Hindi Movies
Alphabetical
List (511)
 
 
 
 
Articles on Music,
Poetry & Life (96)
Did You Know! (88)
Few Life Inspiring Words! (22)
Nostalgia (Books on Cinema,Vintage Magazines, Scans & more) (28)
 
 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 
   
 
   SEARCH
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
Google Analytics Alternative
 
 
 
The site is a collection of personal expressions of the writer to share his own views on different mediums of art, with no intention of hurting any person or organisation in particular. The site is also not responsible for any inappropriate acts practiced by the third party links added here only for information purposes.
   Visit bobbytalkscinema.com for Bollywood Movie Reviews, Inspired Cinema, Movies To See Before You Die, Amazing Bollywood Facts, Articles On Cinema, Music, Poetry & Life
 
Site Best View At 1024 X 768 Resolution & Above